Victimization - Crime in Modern America

As a way of dealing with victim and crime problems in upstart America, criminologists study the relationship betwixt criminals and their criminal acts with four theories: modus vivendi, victim audacity, routine activities, and deviant place. lifestyle theory emphasizes that based on lifestyle choices, people get down targets when exposed to situations and criminal offenders, tether to committing crimes. Examples of some lifestyle choices implicate residing in bad areas, profuse drug and alcohol use, passing game out at nighttime alone, and working with known felons. In this theory, soulfulnessality traits are share by the victims, which stinkpot be seen in law violators same low self-control and impulsivity (Finkelhor & Asdigian, 1996). This notes the contact between perpetrators and victims of crimes. In affinity to more conservative lifestyle counterparts, both show antisocial and impulsive behaviors, which king comport to their development since they cause th e person to increase higher chances for victimization.\n victim presumption deals with the position where the victims might initiate active or passive criminal acts that lead story to death or fault (Outlaw, Ruback, & Britt, 2002). It is the idea that in that respect is a struggle of power when there is a passive precipitation of violence. During passive precipitation, an attack is initiated by behaviors done unconsciously by the victim. One example that can be used is a politician. An activist group attracter threatens him due to his actions attracting negative characteristics from his spirit and actions that can harm society. When the attackers domain is unknown to the victim, passive precipitation can also exist. In this case, long-time employees are threatened because a new employee might right away rise above somatic ranks.\nRoutine activity measures victimization based on a set of conditions reflected upon typical individuals routines: 1) absence seizure of capable pr otectors 2) Existence of prompt off...