'Racial and Criminal Profiling: a Deductive Argument Essay\r'

'Erin C completelyihan, AIUSA, states that â€Å"Increased national security should not equate to decreased civil liberties. All mess ar entitled to due process and other basic human rights and constitutional protections” (Amnesty International). racial Profiling, tally to Amnesty International, occurs when wash is used by equity enforcement or private security officials, to any degree, as a basis for criminal suspicion in non-suspect specific investigations. The Constitution, which is arguably the more or less important memorandum of the linked States, clearly states that either soul has the rights to life, closeness and the pursuit of happiness.\r\nThis document sets the Ameri push aside people asunder from many other countries in that it is supposed to happen us sufficient rights. An issue that has risen in the assume in States time and time again and has be this equality is that of go and racism. Now in fair tactical manoeuvre enforcement from the leve ls of your local law de sortment to that of prestigious FBI units there is the specialization in compose, racial profile to be more exact. racial profiling has not except proven to be largely unsuccessful, simply it is violating our equal rights ending up in over bureau in America’s prisons and discrimination in the real worldly concern.\r\nRace is a fondly lay downed kind of categorization that has often been misunderstood, holding to different forms of racism. It is a set of sh atomic add up 18d interests, characteristics, and culture. Race is an illusion that has been created to construct identity. Identity is not totally decided by you, but chosen for you by what people ease up decided about you. The fashion that people invite other people and things as right or wrong depends on the culture you, the individual, is living in. This hence stags identity as something that is mostly cultural. Race is corresponding a stereotype, or over generalization, that i s reservation prejudices that lead to racism. A prejudice is any preconceived trust without correct or adequate information. Through something that is socially constructed through culture, like accele ramble,\r\nRace is elusive to bill and apply to people because it is self identified. harmonize to Ailya Saperstein and Andrew M. Penner in their article â€Å"The Race of a abominable prove: How enslavement Colors Racial Perceptions”, â€Å" almost look on race in the United States treats race as an intrinsic characteristic of individuals, a laid group membership ascribed at birth and ground on one’s ancestry” (93). This is difficult to put into use in the real world because if you gain one idea of what each race is you give find that people are different depending on where you are, the time period you are there, the come up of interaction with other cultures, and the history in that trim back among many other variables.\r\nAn warning of this woul d be how I was considered to be really Mexican at UCSB, merely I am considered â€Å"White washed” by my family, and I consider myself to be a conclave of both as well as Colombian. As having been grown up first generation American it is very terrible on me to bedevil been Latina. When I studied abroad last year in Argentina I was not considered Latina at all, but White. The Argentine had a different perception of race and insisted that it didn’t matter where your parents were from, it only mattered where you were born. The bulk of the universe does not fit into only that one set most researchers yield put them in.\r\nRace is touch by the population in power and as such can be seen as a form to keep the post quo. The minorities in a society are often the ones that have a negative reputation and have to deal with the social construct others have made about them. Examples of minorities would be Blacks, Latinos and Muslims. The three races have faced a clutch of scrutiny here in the United States. They have been accused of creationness a large part of the iniquity population, being uneducated, and being terrorists. Although most are not this is the stereotype they have to live with every day.\r\nWhen you are part of the majority you line up to make up your own identity, which usually ends up being positive. When you are part of the majority, in the case of the United States this would White, it usually means you a doing well or better than others socially. Other things associated with Whites would be a higher(prenominal) education and the suburbs. As the dominant culture all the truths that are created have had them in mind. Racism is institutional prejudice and as such it is hidden. in that respectfore in order to be racist I would signal you need to be part of the dominant culture.\r\nThere is a misrepresentation in the incarceration is an example of racial profiling as being unconstitutional. The majority of the population of inca rcerated rates is made up of Blacks and Latinos. stool it be that they are truly a abhorrence committing race and since Whites are educated they perform slight than half the crime? The answer to this is no. African Americans have long been subjugated to felons since the history of the United States began. They were seen as lowly and uneducated and convicted of crimes they did not commit. ineffectual to fight back due to the fact that no one would listen or care point if they knew they were wrong they had to endure punishment. It is a fact that if you are part of the dominant culture the punishment will be less severe.\r\nThe thing about the Rodney poove incident that enraged people was not whether he was guilty or not it was the manner in which he was prosecuted. He was beaten severely below the belt without being able to have a outpouring to see if he was guilty. In the eye of the law you are â€Å"innocent until proven guilty”, and Mr. world-beater was never given a fighting chance. other example of discrimination through racism would be the immigration law in genus Arizona that â€Å"requires police officers, â€Å"when practicable,” to detain people they reasonably suspect are in the country without authorization and to verify their status with federal officials” according to Randall C. Archibold of the NY propagation (par. 22). How is a person reasonably suspect of being an illegal? This is do those physical features. The fourteenth amendment provides protection against unreasonable searches ground on race. Is this law not an example of that?\r\nSaperstein and Penner grapple that racial profiling, through incarceration rates, affects the individuals, families and communities (93-94). If we start from the jacket crown we see that Latinos and Blacks do not constitute even half of our government making it misrepresentative of our population. One way racial profiling affects the individual is by making it harder for them to obtain a job, let alone a well paying job. Sometimes the individual has to move a crap at a young age to dish out their parents with rent and other necessities. This is why we see and and then associate Latinos and Blacks in low income neighborhoods. Once you are part of the minority and have been incarcerated the odds of you succeed in life get significantly slimmer.\r\nAccording to Saperstein and Penner if you have been incarcerated for something narcotics related then you are modify for a lot of the aid the government offers. In your FAFSA application you are asked if you have been convicted of any medicine related felony. If you press yes then you are not eligible for financial aid. Since most of these families cannot afford to come in their children off to college that option completely diminishes. As a result you have communities with low income, who are most educated to the high school level, if that with high unemployment.\r\nlet’s put aside the fact that raci al profiling goes against the constitution and look to see if it genuinely works. According to sources the FBI’s use of criminal profiling has a low success rate. Their success rate can be equaled by that of psychics some would argue. professional Ron Davis of the Oakland Police Department said it best in September 9, 2003 to NOBLE when he stated that â€Å"Racial profiling . . . is one of the most ineffective strategies, and I call it nothing less than lazy, sloppy police work.\r\nIt’s basically saying you dupe’t want to learn about your community, you jade’t want to learn about people’s behavior, you don’t want to do your job, and don’t want to investigate, you just want to hang on a lot of people and see if you can come up with some statistical number at the end of the evening. . . .”. (Amnesty International) There has been criticism on the process because essentially what you are is forgetting about the hard evidence a nd guessing up a cypher of what the perpetrator looks like. Profilers have forgotten was fieldwork is and have rick armchair professionals that don’t need to go to the crime scene to get insight. In Macolm Gladwell’s What the red hot Saw he describes the job of a profiler as relying on typology to paint a picture of the killer.\r\nMost of reasoning behind this technique is that of homology, the relationship among the culprit and the action. Gladwell noticed that there were two categories of killers, create and unorganized. The organized chose their dupe carefully and went through capital measures to not be caught. The disorganized killer chose their victim randomly with usually high stakes of being caught.\r\nGladwell finds out that people don’t fall strictly into one category therefore crimes don’t fall into one category. You can have the same crime done for different motives. By relying on connections they are making up ground on theories they ha ve made up that have made this guessing game that Gladwell calls a â€Å" society trick” (354). The moral of his story being in a way like Einstein’s in that if you get enough wrongs you eventually get a right. However, there is too much a stake, one of these being people’s lives, to play a guessing game at that level.\r\nRacial profiling and Criminal profiling are unconstitutional and frankly a waste of time. Racial profiling opens the door and accepts discrimination to uphold the status quo. Criminal profiling is a waste of time, tax dollar mark money and obscured by racial profiling. Let’s stop with these erroneous short cuts and really take the time to evaluate what racial profiling actually does to others.\r\nWorks Cited\r\nAmnesty International | Working to nourish Human Rights. Amnesty International USA, 2011. Web. 20 Mar. 2011. Archibold, Randall C. â€Å"Arizona Enacts Stringent Law on Immigration.” New York\r\nTimes 23 Apr. 2010, New Yo rk ed., A1 sec. New York TImes, 23 Apr. 2010. Web. 21 Mar. 2011. Gladwell, Malcolm. â€Å"Dangerous Minds.” What the Dog Saw: and Other guess Stories. Camberwell, Vic.: Allen Lane, 2009. 336-56. Print. Saperstein, Aliva, and Andrew M. Penner. â€Å"The Race of a Criminal Record: How Incarceration Colors Racial Perceptions.” Social Problems 57.1 (2010): 92-113. JSTOR. Web. 20 Mar. 2011.\r\n'