Carol Ann Duffy Notes

The poem closes with reminders of oppression, control and confine custodyt. Possibility that was once limitless for the dolphins straight has limits imposed upon it that pull up stakes become impossible to bear. The realisation will believably hasten the creatures death, signalling that in that location is as much at stake from a psychological perspective as there is from the physical circumstances. Stifling of inseparable impulse and behaviour can arrest fatal consequences. The plastic toy is a further reminder of the indignity visited on this majestic creature of the ocean.The phrase until the sound blows is potentially ambiguous. In one level it simply refers to the controlling wind mappingd by the keeper but on a nonher the poet might be reminding us that this sort of cruelty will continue until individual exposes it for what it is. Duffy does effectively blow the whistle on such practices. The final tonal pattern, with its reference to our mind, neatly links the plur al possessive pronoun with the singular noun mind indicating a collective congressman for a species.The tense change to we will draws attention to the contrast between what the dolphins had, what they have now and can expect in the future. As a force, the dolphins acquire an almost mythic status in that they appeal to archetypal impulses in us and in nature they are not save the creatures who tier part of it. The Dolphins may just as easily be articulate as a poem well-nigh human disillusion, betrayal and exhalation of direction as it is ab expose animals. As an interpreter of experience it offers us a new address into which we would do well to translate ourselves. abroad Duffys preoccupation with language is dealt with here form the perspective of its cultural logical implication as much as its ability to say anything. To the immigrant, the country to which he or she has moved out of economic necessity will forever and a day be foreign but the indigenous population will regard them as foreigners. The fact that living in a foreign culture is something that is not easy to get determinationd to is emphasised in the opening line of the poem. contempt living in a city for twenty years it form strange.The immigrant is aware of his or her own foreign accent as it sounds to others. The strain of thought in one language and having to translate into the speech of another cannot forever and a day be sustained and this is sensitively pointed out through the physical locating in the final stanza And in the delicatessen, from time to time, the coins / in your palm will not translate. The breakdown in communication in an everyday, exposed transactional situation is intensified through the talking to Inarticulate and point.Duffys empathic feeling for such concourse is further expressed in her presentation of other actions such as writing home, a way of maintaining contact with others of the same culture. The local dialect in the immigrants head is couple d with the memory of his or her mother singing. These are details with which any sympathetic person might identify and throw into sharp embossment the actual experience of seeing racist graffiti sprayed in red (line 12). Duffys use of the simile, Red like blood to describe the paint is effective because of its monosyllabic fairness of observation.It also resonates with a famous and terrible speech given by the Conservative politician Enoch Powell who, on 20th April 1968 warned that increased immigration into Britain would result in a river of blood. There is, then, a stark contrast between the uses of language as a sign system of cultural inclusion (stanza 2) and its deliberate use as a weapon of racial censure (stanza 3). The hate name of the racists is sprayed on a brick wall the harshness and unyielding nature of which is exemplary of the mentality of those who do such things.The unfamiliar, snowy weather and artificial neon lights create the impression for the immigrant tha t the country moved to is coming to bits. This image of fragmentation is, though, not entirely imaginary as he or she has a life splintered from all that is familiar and constantly experiences a sense of alienation. The italicised words at the close of the poem give voice to the immigrant but this just gives away a difficulty with incline. The unfinished verbs, Me not know and It like they whole are drawn attention to by Duffy in order that the contributor may ponder what it would be like to face the same language problem.The final words of the poem, Imagine that remind us of the opening and there is quite a clear impression that Duffy is adopting an undisguised didactic stance. As a skilled and empowered user of the incline language herself she is drafting attention to the lot of those who are marginalised because of their deficiency in its use. Head of English The poet is introduced to the class by the Head of English who has very fixed views about what meter should be. As in Comprehensive, the school in question is a multi-ethnic institution.It is significant that the instructor should be dismissing the live muliebrity poet because she does not conform to the Keatsean ideal in the teachers mind. She is not dead and she is not male. How anyone with English second language is expected to relate to dead white English men is clearly a challenge laid down in the poem. The quint six line stanzas are indicative of a controlled, contained environment, the institution and the teacher are reflected in this. Duffy does not choose to use hoarfrost throughout (as the teacher predicted) but reserves some obvious rhymes for the teacher to use.This is a very subtle use of a poetic technique to make fun someone who is complaining about its absence from modern poetry. So, simultaneously, Duffy is using a poetic technique to show that the teacher is wrong about it beingness absent from modern verse whilst showing that the rhyme, being obvious, is the sort essen tial by the teacher. The reference to Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936) is significant for a number of reasons. His poems do rhyme very regularly, and a number of them are redolent of British imperialism and patriotism in the Victorian period.This is actually grossly offensive in a multicultural context. Winds of change is a wittily ambiguous phrase since it refers to the words of Harold Macmillan, British Prime Minister 1957-63 speaking of political events such as the well-bred war in the Congo following the granting of independence from Belgium. It also tells us that the teacher is referring to flatulence, as well as reinforcing her own entrenched views. Duffy is ironically drawing attention to the fact that Calliope, the Muse and source of afflatus, breath of inspiration for poets is break up by an unwelcome allusion to noxious gases.The control possible in adopting a persona in the dramatic monologue is clear. Single word sentences, a hallmark of Duffys verse, work very well in capt uring the terse, rude pose of the teacher. Still. (stanza 2) Right. (stanza 4) and Well. Really. (stanza 5) show that she is singularly unimpressed by what she has heard. Here, it is what is implied by Duffys economical use of language that is so effective in building an impression of what this woman is like.The idea of someone being in charge of an English department who cannot see that it is she who actually has the outside view is worrying. The fact that she devotes a whole lesson to vowel rhyme also indicates the deadly boring teaching methods she employs. She obviously teaches technique out of context in the same way that she cannot accept modern poetry as belonging to a literary tradition. Like any pitiful English teacher she views tradition as something strictly to do with an out of reach(predicate) past.It is striking that it is the silent space between the fifth and sixth stanzas that the poet has been allowed to read. Despite having encouraged pupils to ask questio ns after all were paying forty pounds, the teachers retort to the poets reading is telling as she instructs the class to run along. The reader wonders just what insight the teacher has actually gained. Also, her pupils are unlikely to derive much from her teaching. much worrying, though, are the entrenched attitudes of a person who should not be in charge of the most expansive of subjects studied at school.