Biographical and Psychological Strategies Essay

Often, people would resolve into using the biographical strategy when they come into a dead end in trying to interpret a work. This is what I desire about this particular strategy because it can provide answers to unreciprocated questions that are non possible to be derived from the work alone. Sometimes, a view at the life of the author helps in under place uprighting a spell of literature.Some say that is a lazy mans access code into interpreting a text but that does not mean that it is not an effective way. I believe that in all works, there is everlastingly a piece of the author in their writings, making this strategy a valid one. We simply cannot deny the fact that the works of an author are almost always influenced by his experiences. I also like how this cash advance becomes investigative in nature because of the digging of information for the authors lives.What I fathert Like About Psychological Strategies Unlike biographical strategies, psychological strategies do not quite get me that excited. This strategy urges critics to look for exemplary meanings in every work which just complicate things. Though I understand the importance of symbols in literature, this strategy can sometimes be used as well as much and give symbolism into things and events that are not even meant by the author to have symbols.Though this might play off my likeness for biographical strategies, I believe that events should (at least most of the time) stand on their own. Another thing that I do not like about psychological strategies is the Oedipus complex theory it is just far too taboo for me to think of such things. Speaking of theory, this is what mostly this strategy is ground ontheory, which means, it is not as reliable as a biographical approach because the latter is based on the lives of the authors, not on speculated ideas.