Animal Testing Essay -- Animal Testing

ISSUE For the close to part, we would not be able to live rattling comfortably without them. The drumhead of what is considered proper treatment of animals has been highly debated by groups looking at two the moral and ethical issues of the situation. What exactly is our proper role with regard to non-human creatures? Do they puzzle any rights, or may we do as we delight with them? These are questions that politicians all over the world have been arguing or so for some(prenominal) years, and still is as controversial as everoccupation How can animal testing benefit both animals and humans without harming the animals? minimize For thousands of years, humans have used animals for a variety of purposes including food, clothing, labor, means of transportation, hunting, medicine, and companionship. However, many personal beauty products, such as lipstick, face cream, anti-perspirant, and laundry detersive all have one major characteristic in usual the suffering and death of mil lions of animals (Dickinson 13). Canada has no legislation to protect laboratory animals from any form of mistreatment, abuse, or neglect. Great Britain has nothing in the way of ingrained ethical treatment of laboratory animals. In the United States, the U.S. Welfare animal Act (passed in 1966 and later amended in 1970 and 1976) charges the U.S. Department of husbandry with overseeing the humane handling and housing of animals in laboratories, pet dealerships, and exhibitions. While the lawfulness covers lab animals (such as rabbits, mice, dogs, and monkeys) it does not state that the animals are to be cared for or to be treated for injuries received from experiments, nor does it state that animals in laboratories can be used for save a countersinked yield of experiments with the least possible suffering and distress (Dickinson 15). In effect then, there is no protection given to lab animals. On average, 25 million animals die all(prenominal) year in North America for the testing of e rattlingthing from impudently cosmetics to new methods of warfare. Five hundred thousand to one million of these animals are sacrificed from each one year to test new cosmetics alone (Dickinson 13). on that point are many kinds of tests performed on animals. One kind is the Acute Toxicity Test, which requires between 60 and 100 animals to determine what constitutes a lethal dose of a situation substance. The test spans a time period from two weeks to seven years,... ...ly limit their options. They have used animals for so long, their tests will most likely have to be changed. Changing the procedures of these tests could be extremely costly and time consuming. option B Requiring pet owners to spay or neuter their pets.ADVANTAGES This is a very effective way to limit the number of animals used in testing. legion(predicate) of these animals tested are often strays and have had no owner. If pet owners were involve to fix their pets, it would really help in controllin g the nation-wide pet population. There would be fewer unwanted animals roaming the streets in search for a feller resulting in fewer unwanted pregnancies. Consequently, scientists would have a limited number of animals to work with. DISADVANTAGES Breeders and pet-store owners would be in a bad position. This would mean that they would all have to go through tedious amounts of paper work in order to own animals that could still reproduce, or they would have to find a new career For many people, taking care of animals has been a very big part of their life. Some have come to see it as more of a hobby than a job. For others, it may be the only thing that still brings joy into their lives