Cambridge Syllabus With Qns

There will be no line specifically asking for examples it is assumed that they will form a subjective part of the response. roughly questions will require specific reference to capital of Singapore and Singapore issues. The paper will consist of a mixture of get questions and statements that argon intended to irritate a response from the candidate. The latter should provoke thought, rather than just acceptance of the assertion. Whilst some questions may appear to ingest a particularly topical flavor, this is the result of chance, not design, since questions be luck rise in advance of the year in which either tending(p) examination is taken.Of course, candidates are able to make utilisation of such cloth for the purpose of relevant illustration, but any attempt to spot a presumable topic for a given year is unlikely to prove personaful. The inclose of the Questions The Principal Examiner submits a selection of proposed questions, covering a set about of topic areas. T hese are then scrutinized by a panel of aged(a) Examiners / Moderators for comment / draw outed changes or modifications. The purpose of this is to ensure balance and to avoid any possible misunderstanding Or ambiguity in the wording that could discriminate candidates.The Principal Examiner reviews the first draft in the light of the preceding(prenominal) and submits a second version of the Paper which is discussed and finalized at a concourse with the Subject Officer and the Scrutinizers. All questions are equally weighted. There is no credit given to a response to a question hardly beca workout it may be deemed more difficult. For the sake of rarity in the Paper, motley words / phrase are used as question prompts e. G Discuss, Do you agree? , To what extent, Is it fair? , How far? . There is little or no difference in the demands of the question depending on the prompt that is used.However, key words to note are always, never, every, all, and any other words that seem to s uggest an extreme position, or one that offers no alternative view. This is a highly unlikely situation and such words or phrases should be challenged. Some Thoughts on the hire of English The Principal Examiners report for the past few years has stressed the point hat Centers and Candidates appear to be well aware of the demands of the Paper, but that it is the quality of expression that is the clearest discriminator between scripts.The Reports bewilder also listed the recurrent nature of the problems to be found in weaker scripts. Essentially, these disturb to a) subject / verb agreement b) confused and insecure use of tenses c) incorrect use of prepositions d) incorrect use of spoken row / common confusions e) certain recurrent Structures, especially Although Because . Candidates somemagazines seem to rely on stock words and phrases. Whilst this can facilitate retain students, it can also detract from a sense of a confident personal voice.Nothing can replace the experience of developing language in context through broad reading of quality texts. Candidates are given credit for what is termed felicitous expression and examples of good vocabulary and phrasing are acknowledged with a tick in the text. This often acts as an indicator when assessing the Use of English mark that a script is approaching the top band. Nevertheless, this only applies if the use of such vocabulary forms part of an overall fluency in the writing. A simple style does not have to be simplistic.Poor control, leading to a breakd deliver in sentence structure, is the greatest reason for a deplorable English mark. By simply varying sentence openings, and ensuring that economy of language is achieved, a good mark can be gained for use of English. The use of jargon, especially when addressing economic and social issues, has already been raised. These are not needs undesirable, as long as they are explained and form part of the candidates own individual style. Introductions are very im portant and examiners are asked to make a brief comment on the Opening to each essay.An effective inception shows an immediate awareness of the central issues of the question, defining any difficult words, or ones that require clear parameters for the purpose of the discussion. Often, however, candidates waste too much time in defining unnecessarily simple ideas, such as a school or a business. Of course, it is useful to give a brief eyeshade of the different types in each case, but there are occasion when an over-pedantic attempt at definition merely blurs the introduction, rather than clarifying the focal point that the essay will aim to pursue.